Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chief Justice John Roberts results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 2,763 hits . Analysis detected 16,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,951 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,647 of 37,536 keywords). This Chief Justice John Roberts is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Chief Justice John Roberts
Keyword details
Total words: 6,951
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.0% percentile 5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 39.8% 39.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 33.6% 33.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.5% 25.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.8%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 33.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst