Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chicago Under Siege results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 452 hits . Analysis detected 1,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,785 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Under Siege is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chicago Under Siege
Keyword details
Total words: 1,785
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 25.3% 25.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.2% 20.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst