Keyword summary
27% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Teachers Union results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 2,238 hits . Analysis detected 16,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,558 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,860 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Teachers Union is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Chicago Teachers Union
Keyword details
Total words: 23,558
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles23.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst