Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Sky results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 280 hits . Analysis detected 2,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,875 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,705 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Sky is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Chicago Sky
Keyword details
Total words: 1,875
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst