Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chicago Artists results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 685 hits . Analysis detected 3,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,783 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Artists is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chicago Artists
Keyword details
Total words: 3,783
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst