Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chewing results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 855 hits . Analysis detected 3,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,871 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,132 of 37,536 keywords). This Chewing is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Chewing
Keyword details
Total words: 5,871
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst