Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chester County results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,858 hits. Analysis detected 7,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,976 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (33,973 of 37,536 keywords). This Chester County is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Chester County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠10%Chester County (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,976
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos