Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cherokee Nation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 1,353 hits . Analysis detected 4,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,871 of 37,536 keywords). This Cherokee Nation is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Cherokee Nation
Keyword details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 34.9% 34.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 34.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst