Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheng Li Wun results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 136 hits . Analysis detected 1,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of 98% (1,022 of 37,536 keywords). This Cheng Li Wun is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Cheng Li Wun
Keyword details
Total words: 500
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.3% percentile 13.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles500 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 20.8% 20.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 26.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst