Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chemical Leak results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 695 hits. Analysis detected 4,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (15,178 of 34,437 keywords). This Chemical Leak is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Chemical Leak
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
56%Chemical Leak (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos