Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chemehuevi Tribe results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 752 hits . Analysis detected 4,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,151 of 37,536 keywords). This Chemehuevi Tribe is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Chemehuevi Tribe
Keyword details
Total words: 7,328
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst