Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Handler results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Bandwagon , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 338 hits . Analysis detected 2,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,610 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,021 of 36,778 keywords). This Chelsea Handler is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Chelsea Handler
Keyword details
Total words: 2,610
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst