Keyword summary
50% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,068 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chatham County results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 658 hits . Analysis detected 4,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,278 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (43,106 of 56,600 keywords). This Chatham County is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Chatham County
Keyword details
Total words: 7,278
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst