Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlotte Motor Speedway results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Hindsight Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 344 hits . Analysis detected 2,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,309 of 37,536 keywords). This Charlotte Motor Speedway is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Charlotte Motor Speedway
Keyword details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst