Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlotte Motor Speedway results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 2,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,309 of 37,536 keywords). This Charlotte Motor Speedway is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Charlotte Motor Speedway
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos