Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Schumer results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,099 of 34,832 keywords). This Charles Schumer is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Charles Schumer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
23%Charles Schumer (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510022.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos