Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Charles Neil Floyd results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,444 keywords). This Charles Neil Floyd is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Charles Neil Floyd
Keyword details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst