Keyword summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlene Wang results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Bandwagon, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 921 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (30,686 of 37,536 keywords). This Charlene Wang is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Charlene Wang
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠19%Charlene Wang (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510018.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos