Keyword summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chance The Snapper results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 275 hits. Analysis detected 1,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (10,158 of 37,536 keywords). This Chance The Snapper is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Chance The Snapper
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠73%Chance The Snapper (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.2%17.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos