Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Massturd results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 972 hits . Analysis detected 4,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,081 of 37,536 keywords). This Cesar Massturd is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. Cesar Massturd
Keyword details
Total words: 2,756
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.1% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 35.3% 35.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 24.2% 24.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Keyword 35.3%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst