Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Chavez Park results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Bandwagon, and Negativity Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,097 of 37,533 keywords). This Cesar Chavez Park is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Cesar Chavez Park
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Cesar Chavez Park (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,284
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.4% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos