Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Center For Effective Public Management (cepm) results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 337 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Center For Effective Public Management (cepm) is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Center For Effective Public Management (cepm)
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,536
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos