Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Center For Animal Rescue And Enrichment Of St Louis results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 869 hits. Analysis detected 6,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Center For Animal Rescue And Enrichment Of St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Center For Animal Rescue And Enrichment Of St Louis
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 11,872
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos