Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cellphone Apps results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 750 hits. Analysis detected 3,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,436 of 37,536 keywords). This Cellphone Apps is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Cellphone Apps
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Cellphone Apps (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos