Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Chefs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 493 hits . Analysis detected 4,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,802 of 37,533 keywords). This Celebrity Chefs is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. Celebrity Chefs
Keyword details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst