Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video2,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cedric J Robinson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,863 hits. Analysis detected 11,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 81% (9,630 of 49,108 keywords). This Cedric J Robinson is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Cedric J Robinson
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
81%Cedric J Robinson (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.0%21.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos