Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caught On Camera results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,471 of 37,498 keywords). This Caught On Camera is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Caught On Camera
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Caught On Camera (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos