Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cattle Ranchers results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 783 hits. Analysis detected 5,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,428 of 37,536 keywords). This Cattle Ranchers is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Cattle Ranchers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
97%Cattle Ranchers (selected)12%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
11.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 44.8%44.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 48.3%48.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 55.3%55.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 35.8%35.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 55.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 48.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 44.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 35.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos