Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catholic Sisters results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 617 hits . Analysis detected 3,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (29,137 of 34,832 keywords). This Catholic Sisters is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Catholic Sisters
Keyword details
Total words: 6,208
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst