Keyword summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cassandra Rauert results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 435 hits . Analysis detected 3,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,497 of 37,536 keywords). This Cassandra Rauert is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Cassandra Rauert
Keyword details
Total words: 5,568
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst