Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlo Ancelotti results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hindsight Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 826 hits . Analysis detected 3,697 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,522 of 37,533 keywords). This Carlo Ancelotti is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Carlo Ancelotti
Keyword details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.2% 24.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst