Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carey Mulligan results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 884 hits . Analysis detected 5,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,471 of 37,536 keywords). This Carey Mulligan is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group. Carey Mulligan
Keyword details
Total words: 2,908
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.8% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.4% 30.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst