Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Career Diplomats results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 63.6% saturation with 929 hits . Analysis detected 4,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,461 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of 99% (674 of 37,536 keywords). This Career Diplomats is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Career Diplomats
Keyword details
Total words: 1,461
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.2% percentile 16.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 63.6% 63.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 54.8% 54.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 27.4% 27.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 34.4% 34.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Keyword 63.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 54.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 34.4%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst