Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capitol Hill Testimony results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 442 hits . Analysis detected 2,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,119 of 37,536 keywords). This Capitol Hill Testimony is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Capitol Hill Testimony
Keyword details
Total words: 1,920
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.4% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst