Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candidate Replacement results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 3,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,642 of 37,536 keywords). This Candidate Replacement is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Candidate Replacement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Candidate Replacement (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,208
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.1%19.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos