Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Canada Men's National Soccer Team results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 721 hits. Analysis detected 3,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Canada Men's National Soccer Team is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Canada Men's National Soccer Team
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 21.1%21.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos