Keyword summary
84%1 analyzed article/video1,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campus Politics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 812 hits. Analysis detected 6,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (26,244 of 59,653 keywords). This Campus Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Campus Politics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
56%Campus Politics (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos