Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Californians Against Waste results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,814 of 37,536 keywords). This Californians Against Waste is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Californians Against Waste
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,672
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos