Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California State Parks results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,518 hits . Analysis detected 7,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,598 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,127 of 37,536 keywords). This California State Parks is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. California State Parks
Keyword details
Total words: 10,598
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst