Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Academy Of Sciences results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 207 hits . Analysis detected 2,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,798 of 37,536 keywords). This California Academy Of Sciences is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. California Academy Of Sciences
Keyword details
Total words: 4,864
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst