Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Refunds results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 267 hits. Analysis detected 2,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,964 of 37,536 keywords). This Business Refunds is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Business Refunds
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
55%Business Refunds (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,812
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos