Keyword summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bureau Of Business And Economic Research results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (30,339 of 49,303 keywords). This Bureau Of Business And Economic Research is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Bureau Of Business And Economic Research
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠39%Bureau Of Business And Economic Research (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,816
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos