Keyword summary
52%1 analyzed article/video747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Buffalos results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 958 hits. Analysis detected 2,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,986 of 36,741 keywords). This Buffalos is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Buffalos
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
76%Buffalos (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos