Keyword summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Buffalos results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 958 hits . Analysis detected 2,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,986 of 36,741 keywords). This Buffalos is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Buffalos
Keyword details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 32.1% 32.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst