Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Senate results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 4,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,753 of 37,536 keywords). This Budget Senate is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Budget Senate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Budget Senate (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.3%24.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos