Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooklyn Coop Israeli Goods Boycott results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 1,843 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (19,621 of 37,536 keywords). This Brooklyn Coop Israeli Goods Boycott is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Brooklyn Coop Israeli Goods Boycott
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos