Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British Jews results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 766 hits . Analysis detected 7,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,282 of 37,536 keywords). This British Jews is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. British Jews
Keyword details
Total words: 4,900
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst