Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brit Hume results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 164 hits . Analysis detected 1,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,643 of 37,536 keywords). This Brit Hume is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Brit Hume
Keyword details
Total words: 1,780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.0% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst