Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brigham Young University (byu) results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 254 hits. Analysis detected 2,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,226 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (9,691 of 37,530 keywords). This Brigham Young University (byu) is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Brigham Young University (byu)
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,226
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 11.2%11.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos