Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brian Fitzpatrick results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 3,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,518 keywords). This Brian Fitzpatrick is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Brian Fitzpatrick
Keyword details
Total words: 2,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 22.3% 22.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst