Keyword summary
72%1 analyzed article/video285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brent Taylor results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (7,019 of 37,536 keywords). This Brent Taylor is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Brent Taylor
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Brent Taylor (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.1%18.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos