Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Pitts Girlfriend Ines Ramon Accused Pulling Away Taylor Swift Wedding Snap results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 978 hits. Analysis detected 3,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (9,236 of 37,536 keywords). This Brad Pitts Girlfriend Ines Ramon Accused Pulling Away Taylor Swift Wedding Snap is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Brad Pitts Girlfriend Ines Ramon Accused Pulling Away Taylor Swift Wedding Snap
Keyword details
Total words: 3,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 28.0%28.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos